If architects want to lead the housing debate, they must relearn the vernacular

James Soane big crop

As part of BD’s Designing Tomorrow’s Housing campaign, James Soane explores how architects can reclaim relevance in the housing debate by rethinking the vernacular as a regenerative and ethical form of practice

Architects are the worst people to ask about taste and beauty. Individually they may have impeccable style, but collectively the education of the architect has conditioned many to empathise with a narrow canon of Modernism segueing into Brutalism, but stopping at Post Modernism. In the well-worn, worn-out, argument that pitches classical architecture against modern, there is a whiff of righteous superiority claiming any design quoting the past is pastiche and bankrupt.

In his recent book The City of Today is a Dying Thing, Des Fitzgerald reminds us of Corbusier’s mantra that we must “break with the past”. He goes on to describe Downing College in Cambridge as the most grimly traditional and backwards-looking part of the UK’s most grimly traditional and backwards-looking city.

This content is available to registered users | Already registered?Login here

You are not currently logged in.

To continue reading this story, sign up for free guest access

Existing Subscriber? LOGIN

REGISTER for free access on selected stories and sign up for email alerts. You get:

  • Up to the minute architecture news from around the UK
  • Breaking, daily and weekly e-newsletters

 

Subscribe to Building Design and you will benefit from:

Gated access promo

  • Unlimited news
  • Reviews of the latest buildings from all corners of the world
  • Technical studies
  • Full access to all our online archives
  • PLUS you will receive a digital copy of WA100 worth over £45

Subscribe now for unlimited access.