Why Labour may come to regret closing the Office for Place

Ben-Flatman-photo-cropped

A short-term decision framed as an efficiency risks losing the momentum on creating sustainable, people-centred places, writes Ben Flatman

The announcement this week by the housing minister Matthew Pennycook to shutter the Office for Place echoes a regrettable pattern in the treatment of bodies dedicated to improving the quality of the built environment. Pennycook framed the decision as a matter of efficiency, arguing that the office’s role could be more effectively delivered from within the Ministry of Housing, Communities, and Local Government (MHCLG). Yet, as Nicholas Boys Smith, the Office for Place’s interim chair, remarked, this decision risks “ministers marking their own homework” on housing design.

This content is available to registered users | Already registered?Login here

You are not currently logged in.

To continue reading this story, sign up for free guest access

Existing Subscriber? LOGIN

REGISTER for free access on selected stories and sign up for email alerts. You get:

  • Up to the minute architecture news from around the UK
  • Breaking, daily and weekly e-newsletters

 

Subscribe to Building Design and you will benefit from:

Gated access promo

  • Unlimited news
  • Reviews of the latest buildings from all corners of the world
  • Technical studies
  • Full access to all our online archives
  • PLUS you will receive a digital copy of WA100 worth over £45

Subscribe now for unlimited access.