True placemaking is about so much more than just a numbers game. King’s Cross is a prime example…

kay hughes 1

The delivery of much-needed new homes requires patient, joined-up thinking that takes into account factors other than profit and speed, says former HS2 design director Kay Hughes

As the government seeks to develop mechanisms to deliver 1.5 million homes, the inclusion of the King’s Cross master plan on this year’s Stirling Prize shortlist has been a timely reminder that producing high-quality regeneration and much-needed homes at scale is not a quick fix. It requires long-term vison, stewardship and master plan guidance; in the case of King’s Cross of at least 20 years.

Even though the government has scrapped the “levelling up” slogan, a stable democracy needs successful economic and social places with good environmental benefits, but they do not come quickly.

The delivery of new homes on their own does not necessarily lead to social, low carbon or connected places. We have seen a proliferation of housing estates spring up around towns across the UK. Yes, they do help to meet certain numerical targets, but the developer does not necessarily have a long-term stake in the project.

This content is available to registered users | Already registered?Login here

You are not currently logged in.

To continue reading this story, sign up for free guest access

Existing Subscriber? LOGIN

REGISTER for free access on selected stories and sign up for email alerts. You get:

  • Up to the minute architecture news from around the UK
  • Breaking, daily and weekly e-newsletters

 

Subscribe to Building Design and you will benefit from:

Gated access promo

  • Unlimited news
  • Reviews of the latest buildings from all corners of the world
  • Technical studies
  • Full access to all our online archives
  • PLUS you will receive a digital copy of WA100 worth over £45

Subscribe now for unlimited access.