What does the decision to scrap EWS1 forms for some buildings mean?

Andrew Mellor_PRP_crop

Expect a period of limbo while owners wait for more government guidance – and for insurers to respond, writes Andrew Mellor

Last week MHCLG published a statement on fire safety which focused on medium- to low-rise residential buildings and primarily the external walls of such buildings.

The statement was co-authored by a small group of experts including Judith Hackitt and former fire chief Ken Knight at the request of the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government. Their brief was to consider what the proportional levels of risk are in such buildings, what approaches to risk mitigation are appropriate and, in addition, to consider what the current related impact is on the housing market.

The experts concluded that there have been systemic failures in ensuring quality in residential buildings, yet that the risk to life safety is extremely low in buildings of the heights being considered.

This content is available to registered users | Already registered?Login here

You are not currently logged in.

To continue reading this story, sign up for free guest access

Existing Subscriber? LOGIN

REGISTER for free access on selected stories and sign up for email alerts. You get:

  • Up to the minute architecture news from around the UK
  • Breaking, daily and weekly e-newsletters

 

Subscribe to Building Design and you will benefit from:

Gated access promo

  • Unlimited news
  • Reviews of the latest buildings from all corners of the world
  • Technical studies
  • Full access to all our online archives
  • PLUS you will receive a digital copy of WA100 worth over £45

Subscribe now for unlimited access.