Do we value our profession so little that its future competence is left to chance?

Eleanor Jolliffe

The current education system is formalised and standardised and largely divorced from the realities of practice. It is not really designed to produce good architects, writes Eleanor Jolliffe

At recent graduate summer shows I found myself marvelling at the enthusiasm, the energy and the ideas of the students; and how poorly such potential was being served. Not specifically by our school but by the way that we have evolved architectural education away from the practice of architecture.

Architectural education as we now know it originated in the 1950s – when what became known as the Oxford Conference turned its back on, quite literally, millennia of teaching practices in the optimistic postwar mentality that with new technology and methodology we could do better. I applaud the sentiment and enthusiasm, but the results have been disastrous.

This content is available to registered users | Already registered?Login here

You are not currently logged in.

To continue reading this story, sign up for free guest access

Existing Subscriber? LOGIN

REGISTER for free access on selected stories and sign up for email alerts. You get:

  • Up to the minute architecture news from around the UK
  • Breaking, daily and weekly e-newsletters

 

Subscribe to Building Design and you will benefit from:

Gated access promo

  • Unlimited news
  • Reviews of the latest buildings from all corners of the world
  • Technical studies
  • Full access to all our online archives
  • PLUS you will receive a digital copy of WA100 worth over £45

Subscribe now for unlimited access.