Our choices in 2026 will decide whether architecture remains a public service

Muyiwa Oki cropped

The past president of the RIBA calls for bold thinking and institutional change in order that we can build better

I enter 2026 with two aims: protect the public purpose of architecture and raise the productive capacity of our industry. Both need institutional change and a sharper discipline about social, environmental and economic value.

In about 15-years cycles, technology rewrites the rules that govern productive output. The PCs, the web, and the cloud platforms each reshaped industry. 

Generative AI is the next platform shift, and early signs suggest that it could be bigger than the internet. The independent analyst Benedict Evans calls this “AI eats the world”; a cycle of bundling and unbundling, where incumbents absorb, start-ups disrupt, and workflows fracture before they settle.

This content is available to registered users | Already registered?Login here

You are not currently logged in.

To continue reading this story, sign up for free guest access

Existing Subscriber? LOGIN

REGISTER for free access on selected stories and sign up for email alerts. You get:

  • Up to the minute architecture news from around the UK
  • Breaking, daily and weekly e-newsletters

 

Subscribe to Building Design and you will benefit from:

Gated access promo

  • Unlimited news
  • Reviews of the latest buildings from all corners of the world
  • Technical studies
  • Full access to all our online archives
  • PLUS you will receive a digital copy of WA100 worth over £45

Subscribe now for unlimited access.