Building back or holding back? What the Budget means for architecture

Ben-Flatman-photo-cropped

As Labour’s first Budget in more than a decade promises fresh investment, the sector must grapple with new tax burdens, ambitious spending pledges and lingering gaps in planning reform. Can the built environment industry expect genuine progress, or is this another exercise in managing decline?

This Labour government has inherited what might politely be described as a challenging economic legacy. Fourteen years of sluggish growth and falling incomes, a public realm creaking under years of neglect, and five Conservative prime ministers in rapid succession, oscillating wildly from austerity’s bleak belt-tightening to bouts of equally dizzying spending and borrowing.

Brexit? Its benefits remain as elusive as ever. Beyond abolishing the VAT exemption for private schools – a move that may quietly dent the income of architecture firms long sustained by elite school commissions – the UK’s accomplishments here remain sparse. The previous government failed to attract long-promised major investment or deliver significant benefits from leaving the EU, despite years of promises.

This content is available to registered users | Already registered?Login here

You are not currently logged in.

To continue reading this story, sign up for free guest access

Existing Subscriber? LOGIN

REGISTER for free access on selected stories and sign up for email alerts. You get:

  • Up to the minute architecture news from around the UK
  • Breaking, daily and weekly e-newsletters

 

Subscribe to Building Design and you will benefit from:

Gated access promo

  • Unlimited news
  • Reviews of the latest buildings from all corners of the world
  • Technical studies
  • Full access to all our online archives
  • PLUS you will receive a digital copy of WA100 worth over £45

Subscribe now for unlimited access.