What the second staircase mandate might mean for high-rise architecture

shutterstock_584620648

Source: Shutterstock

Michael Gove announced plans just before Christmas for mandatory second staircases in towers over 30m. But what impact is this likely to have?

”If you had the choice would you choose to live at the top of a 30m block with just one staircase?”

This question, posed by Suzannah Nicol, chief executive of Build UK to Building, perhaps cuts to the heart of the reasoning behind the latest building safety announcement by the government.

Do people still - despite all the new legislation and focus on building safety- understanbaly feel unsafe in tower blocks six years on from Grenfell, unless there are multiple means of escape?

As millions of us were winding down for Christmas on 23 December, the Department for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities (DLUHC) pushed out a short consultation paper  proposing a number of new amendments to approved document B of the building safety regulations.

This content is available to registered users | Already registered?Login here

You are not currently logged in.

To continue reading this story, sign up for free guest access

Existing Subscriber? LOGIN

REGISTER for free access on selected stories and sign up for email alerts. You get:

  • Up to the minute architecture news from around the UK
  • Breaking, daily and weekly e-newsletters

 

Subscribe to Building Design and you will benefit from:

Gated access promo

  • Unlimited news
  • Reviews of the latest buildings from all corners of the world
  • Technical studies
  • Full access to all our online archives
  • PLUS you will receive a digital copy of WA100 worth over £45

Subscribe now for unlimited access.