Stranded assets like 1960s commercial buildings could offer a lifeline in the housing crisis. Miranda MacLaren highlights how architects are uniquely positioned to work with councils and private developers to reimagine these structures as places to live

Miranda Maclaren Staff Contact Photo

Miranda MacLaren

Recently, sitting in a Development Review Panel (DRP), I experienced a moment of optimism. A purpose-built retrofit for changing a stranded office building into emergency accommodation was being discussed, not yet approved but promising.

When some of the design guidance I’d previously been a part of developing was cited, it felt like more than just a professional validation, this was a tangible indication that we might be turning a corner in addressing our housing crisis.

Behind every statistic - £2.3 billion spent on temporary housing in 2023/24 - there are real people searching for a place to call home. Those forgotten commercial buildings, particularly those from the 1960s, aren’t just architectural relics, they’re potential lifelines, waiting to be transformed.

Mid-century commercial buildings offer extraordinary opportunities for residential conversion. Their slender floor plates often measure no more than 12–15 metres deep. They provide exceptional natural light penetration and dual-aspect living potential.

Multiple vertical service cores become a significant design asset. Two or three stair cores allow straightforward unit configuration and enhanced fire safety.

Logo 1

External decks connecting these cores can create additional circulation spaces that break down the institutional feel of emergency accommodation. The structural design of these buildings presents a compelling opportunity.

Modular construction, typically featuring lightweight steel or concrete frames, allows for relatively simple vertical expansion. Additional floors can often be added without significant foundation reinforcement.

Large floor-to-ceiling heights perfectly accommodate repeatable module designs typical in emergency housing. Expansive car parks become strategic assets.

They offer secure, controlled external amenity areas that can be transformed into communal gardens, play spaces or supportive service zones. These spaces create a sense of community and provide safe, supervised environments for residents.

Converting these stranded assets isn’t just about structural modifications. It’s about creating a holistic living environment that supports human dignity and well-being.

Success requires a deep analysis of social infrastructure. This means examining proximity to essential services, understanding local support networks and carefully assessing community dynamics through census data and deprivation indicators.

Accessibility must be fundamental, not an afterthought. Successful retrofits ensure a minimum of five per cent fully accessible units.

Communal areas must be designed to be navigable for everyone. This means considering the needs of single parents with prams, providing lift provisions and eliminating stepped access that might exclude vulnerable residents.

Technical specifications are paramount. Mechanical Ventilation and Heat Recovery systems must control air quality. Careful acoustic design and thermal comfort considerations ensure residents can live with dignity.

Architects are uniquely positioned to support both councils and private developers in reimagining these stranded assets

For family accommodation, spaces must be inclusive, welcoming and colourful. They create supportive, non-institutional environments that prioritise the well-being of children.

The economic challenge of providing emergency and temporary accommodation has reached a critical point. Local authorities are spending billions annually on short-term, often unsuitable housing solutions, with little long-term benefit. Traditional new-build approaches can take years from initial conception to occupancy.

This leaves vulnerable individuals trapped in unstable living conditions. Retrofit schemes offer an alternative, typically reducing construction timelines by 25–40 per cent.

The 40/50-year lease model offers a unique financial solution for local authorities. Under this model, a council enters a long-term lease agreement for a building, with an option to purchase the property for a nominal sum after the lease period.

This means the authority can secure housing with minimal upfront capital investment. The lease payments are often lower than current temporary accommodation costs.

By repurposing existing structures, local authorities can potentially house families and individuals much faster than traditional new construction. This transforms what might seem like an expense into a swift, strategic asset that directly impacts community well-being.

Architects are uniquely positioned to support both councils and private developers in reimagining these stranded assets. While initial conversion costs may seem significant, they pale in comparison to the £2.3 billion currently spent on temporary housing.

This isn’t just about buildings. It’s about creating systems that support vulnerable people, recognising that the cost of poor housing extends far beyond monetary value.

These 1960s commercial buildings scattered across our urban landscapes are more than architectural relics. They’re potential homes, waiting to be reimagined, each retrofit a commitment to the fundamental human right of having a place to call home.