Making Richmount Gardens garden-less: What a post-war Blackheath scheme can tell us about our infill addiction

Trevor Morriss

As infill developments surge in response to London’s housing crisis, the case of Richmount Gardens highlights the costs to community spaces and social infrastructure, writes Trevor Morriss

Before I do something highly unusual and criticise a consented scheme, I should make it known from the outset that while I know Richmount Gardens from a happy childhood spent in south-east London, I have no project interest in its redevelopment. I’m not an ‘on-paper’ objector or a consultee. I am but a bystander, albeit a frustrated one.

Frustrated, because infill is increasingly promoted as a solution to a deepening housing crisis, despite – as in this case – being blatantly detrimental to the welfare of local communities. It is now over six months since I attended a planning committee meeting in the Royal Borough of Greenwich, and yet I am still thinking about the decisions made that evening.

This content is available to registered users | Already registered?Login here

You are not currently logged in.

To continue reading this story, sign up for free guest access

Existing Subscriber? LOGIN

REGISTER for free access on selected stories and sign up for email alerts. You get:

  • Up to the minute architecture news from around the UK
  • Breaking, daily and weekly e-newsletters

 

Subscribe to Building Design and you will benefit from:

Gated access promo

  • Unlimited news
  • Reviews of the latest buildings from all corners of the world
  • Technical studies
  • Full access to all our online archives
  • PLUS you will receive a digital copy of WA100 worth over £45

Subscribe now for unlimited access.