Losing our craft: the tragedy of replace-not-repair architecture

Tanvir Hasan portrait_cropped

Source: Donald Insall Associates

Tanvir Hasan argues that the growing web of regulation and risk aversion is accelerating the loss of historic craftsmanship – and with it, our ability to repair and care for buildings sustainably

I, like many Londoners, live in a late Victorian mansion block. In August last year our freeholders sent us all a letter informing us that our front doors needed upgrading for fire, and suggested a company that could replace our non-compliant doors with fire-graded replicas. It was an easy, expensive option.

The front door to my flat, like many in the block, is an original two-panelled late 19th-century door. It is 50mm thick, made of slow-grown pine or spruce, with a solid lower raised and fielded panel and an upper panel which began its life as a decorative glazed panel. The door had a similarly glazed door light above.

This content is available to registered users | Already registered?Login here

You are not currently logged in.

To continue reading this story, sign up for free guest access

Existing Subscriber? LOGIN

REGISTER for free access on selected stories and sign up for email alerts. You get:

  • Up to the minute architecture news from around the UK
  • Breaking, daily and weekly e-newsletters

 

Subscribe to Building Design and you will benefit from:

Gated access promo

  • Unlimited news
  • Reviews of the latest buildings from all corners of the world
  • Technical studies
  • Full access to all our online archives
  • PLUS you will receive a digital copy of WA100 worth over £45

Subscribe now for unlimited access.