ARB's education reforms ignore Part 1’s value as a degree with broad horizons

Simon Allford Portrait

Source: RIBA

We need more flexible, accessible study routes, but shouldn’t lose the undergraduate architecture degree, writes RIBA president Simon Allford

We welcome the ARB consultation, and we will be making a considered response – which will reinforce the concerns we have raised with ARB. RIBA has petitioned ARB to use RIBA Education’s Themes and Values for Architectural Education, which were the result of a long process of stakeholder engagement into curricular review.

It is vital to ensure that the systems - RIBA’s as validator of education and ARB’s as professional regulator - are aligned.

Like many architects, my career began in the traditional way – at university. But I have long made the case for shorter routes to the register and alternative, more flexible modes of study. Reforming access to education is vital if we are to succeed in creating a more diverse and inclusive profession.

This content is available to registered users | Already registered?Login here

You are not currently logged in.

To continue reading this story, sign up for free guest access

Existing Subscriber? LOGIN

REGISTER for free access on selected stories and sign up for email alerts. You get:

  • Up to the minute architecture news from around the UK
  • Breaking, daily and weekly e-newsletters

 

Subscribe to Building Design and you will benefit from:

Gated access promo

  • Unlimited news
  • Reviews of the latest buildings from all corners of the world
  • Technical studies
  • Full access to all our online archives
  • PLUS you will receive a digital copy of WA100 worth over £45

Subscribe now for unlimited access.