Grenfell Inquiry: Studio E criticises ‘unfit for purpose’ regulatory system

Grenfell Tower wrapped

Source: Shutterstock.com

Opening statement from original refurb architect also expresses ‘deep and profound sorrow’ over tragedy

The architect responsible for the original proposals to put cladding on Grenfell Tower has told the inquiry it believed the regulatory system for buildings had been unfit for purpose for many years before 2017’s tragedy.

In an opening statement to the second part of the Grenfell Inquiry, Studio E’s barrister said the practice had been “truly devastated” by the fire at the west London tower block, which claimed 72 lives, and that it thoroughly supported the aims of the wide-ranging investigation.

Prashant Popat said three current members of staff at the Southwark-based practice and one former colleague would give evidence to the inquiry’s second phase, and were keen to explore the firm’s role and whether doing anything differently could have resulted in a different outcome.

This content is available to registered users | Already registered?Login here

You are not currently logged in.

To continue reading this story, sign up for free guest access

Existing Subscriber? LOGIN

REGISTER for free access on selected stories and sign up for email alerts. You get:

  • Up to the minute architecture news from around the UK
  • Breaking, daily and weekly e-newsletters

 

Subscribe to Building Design and you will benefit from:

Gated access promo

  • Unlimited news
  • Reviews of the latest buildings from all corners of the world
  • Technical studies
  • Full access to all our online archives
  • PLUS you will receive a digital copy of WA100 worth over £45

Subscribe now for unlimited access.