- Home
- Intelligence for Architects
- Subscribe
- Jobs
- Events

Early bird tickets available now
Find out more
Events calendar
Explore now
Keep up to date
Find out more
- Programmes
- CPD
- More from navigation items
Plans to water down environmental protections have been tweaked in an effort to stem another backbench Labour revolt. Two lawyers on either side of the debate give their views on the implications for development as the bill works its way through Parliament
The Planning and Infrastructure Bill is currently making its way through the House of Lords. A key plank of Labour’s plans to “get Britain building”, the bill aims to cut red tape for developers and streamline approval processes needed before spades can get in the ground.
While it has been widely welcomed by the development sector, the proposal to relax nature protections has proved controversial among environmental campaigners and some backbench MPs. Under the original proposals, requirements for site-specific environmental improvements on schemes would be replaced by payments to a centralised nature restoration fund. This would allow Natural England to devise environmental delivery plans (EDPs), which would replace site-specific interventions with the intention of avoiding excessive delays.
No doubt seeking to avoid a repeat of the backbench rebellions on welfare seen in recent months, the government has now amended the bill to strengthen EDPs. To explain the potential implications of this move, Building asked a planning lawyer and an environmental lawyer to give their views on what the amendents could mean for development.
…
You are not currently logged in.
Existing Subscriber? LOGIN
REGISTER for free access on selected stories and sign up for email alerts. You get:
Subscribe to Building Design and you will benefit from:
