Friday18 August 2017

Carbuncle Cup winner 2012: Ship in a throttle

  • Email
  • Comments (76)
  • Save

Grimshaw’s disastrously conceived restoration of the Cutty Sark is winner of this year’s BD Carbuncle Cup, tragically defiling the very thing it sets out to save

The world has recently been mesmerised by the case of Cecilia Giménez, the devout octogenarian from Borja in Spain, whose attempts to restore a fresco of Christ in her local cathedral went so terribly awry. We would ordinarily label someone who had committed such an act a vandal but, for all the ineptitude that she brought to her task, Giménez’s intentions were clearly sound. Her actions demand to be viewed as a tragedy rather than a crime.

In previous years the Carbuncle Cup has been handed out to buildings that were the product of horrifying greed or negligence, but neither charge could be fairly levelled against the backers of this year’s winner.

The spectacularly wrongheaded “restoration” of the Cutty Sark is a project that the charitable trust that owns the ship — the greatest and last remaining 19th century tea clipper — has pursued doggedly for the past eight years. It appointed an architect with an international reputation, and has defended its vision. It has overcome funding crises and even the loss of part of the ship’s fabric in a fire during the course of conservation work. It has worked with the best of intentions and yet has tragically succeeded in defiling the very thing it set out to save.

The scheme’s myriad failings stem from one calamitous choice: the decision to hoick the 154-year-old clipper close to three metres into the air on canted steel props. The Cutty Sark Trust assures us that this very invasive surgery was crucial to the ship’s long-term conservation. Its former dry-docked situation had caused the hull to distort but now, elevated and protected from the elements within a fully air-conditioned glass enclosure, it will supposedly maintain its shape. Historic ship experts have, however, been all but united in their disdain for the strategy. Even the Cutty Sark’s own former chief engineer, Peter Mason, resigned from the project in 2009 after seeing computer simulations that suggested the act of lifting would put a dangerous level of stress on the fabric. So why do it?

The Cutty Sark by Grimshaw

The new arrangement creates a space for corporate functions.

One reason is surely that the project’s architect, Grimshaw, found it exciting. It is notable that the practice’s Spine House, completed in Oberkülheim in Germany in 2000, features a remarkably similar section: a timber-clad, boat-like vessel is held aloft on steel legs, while high-level glazing to either side admits toplight to the undercroft. The architect clearly found the chance to restage this drama using an actual boat irresistible.

The arrangement also presented a powerful commercial appeal. With the £12 price of admission fresh in their memory, the visitor entering the volume created beneath the ship’s hull can’t help but be struck by how little it contains. A café huddles at one end, a display of figureheads at the other, but a game of five-a-side football could comfortably be staged in between. The opportunity to inspect the underside of the hull is welcome enough, but the room’s real raison d’être is the lucrative corporate function trade. As the trust has acknowledged, a key ambition was always to create “a corporate hospitality venue to rival Tate Modern”.

From street level, the once thrilling lines of the ship’s stern and prow have now been obscured behind the new glass enclosure. Misdirected as the strategy was from the start, the early renderings — undertaken when the original concept architect youmeheshe was still involved — did at least suggest a degree of delicacy. Along the way, however, the promised soap-bubble of frameless, double-curved glass has been abandoned in favour of a gawky paraphrase of the roof of Foster’s British Museum Great Court. The issues of how such a thing might meet the ground or how an entrance might be made in it do not appear to have detained the architect for long.

Having found their way past an expansive retail opportunity, visitors are taken into the ship by way of a hole bashed through the side of the hull, before circulating from deck to deck past an exhibition pitched squarely at eight-year-old enthusiasts for Pirates of the Caribbean. On reaching the top, they are taken across a gangway to a huge and startlingly banal lift, stair and air-conditioning tower from which they can access the undercroft.

While the neatness of the circulation diagram can’t be faulted, one is left bewildered by the idea that this jewel of British maritime history should have been subjected to such dramatic adjustment in order to equip it for an age of mass tourism.

The ship demanded the sensitivity afforded to other great small London museums like the Soane, but instead it has been comprehensively reimagined as a theme-park attraction.

The Cutty Sark Trust’s chairman, Maldwin Drummond, has said that the aim was to present the ship “as though for some unexplained reason the crew had gone ashore” — a worthy goal but one that this tragically ill-conceived project singularly fails to meet.

ArcelorMittal Orbit, London.

Source: Charlton/ODA

Near miss: ArcelorMittal Orbit, London.

The sixth annual Carbuncle Cup winner was selected by a jury composed of BD columnists Hank Dittmar, Gillian Darley and Owen Hatherley, along with executive editor Ellis Woodman.

Grimshaw’s Cutty Sark was unanimously selected over five other distressing contenders:

The ArcelorMittal Orbit, London by Cecil Balmond and Anish Kapoor; the Titanic Museum, Belfast, by CivicArts and Todd Architects; Firepool Lock housing, Taunton, by Andrew Smith Architects; Shard End Library, Birmingham by IDP Partnership; and Mann Island, Liverpool by Broadway Malyan.

Stronger-stomached readers are directed to the video of this year’s shortlist.






Readers' comments (76)

  • Anonymous

    The Carbuncle Cup is a disgrace to architecture. Not constructive or clever at all, a bit like BD in general now I think about it. Well done BD for being miserable for yet another year.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • BD would like to clarify that this comment was not left by Chris Wilkinson of Wilkinson Eyre. There are a number of architects and design professionals who share the name.

    Anna Winston,
    Online editor

  • Why is it Chris? Surely its a good thing to open about when we get things terrible wrong in the hope that we might learn from those mistakes?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • BD=The Sun

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I completely agree with you Chris, this should stop.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I smell a conservation officer, planner and a committee in the pie ... it's time BD ditched this nonsense award. After all it's mostly architects who read (?) your articles, and most of us know what is going on and what is good or poor. The editorial content in general has never been really hot and suffers from the usual single minded tunnel vision reporting. Yawn.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I cant believe that tortured mess of steel at the olympic park didnt win. BD is obviously caught up in all the hype about the Olympics... the ArcMittalOrbit has been pretty much universally loathed by everyone with an interest in architecture.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • You criticise the Carbuncle Cup - but THIS IS A MESS of a piece of architecture and gives the award a reason to exist. As a former neighbourhood resident, I can confirm this building is completely insensitive and inappropriate. They should have left the temporary pavilion that youmeheshe did, which somehow was more responsive to the setting while not appearing too 'National Trust' like.

    Architects need to learn from the bad as well as the good stuff.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • What an unfortunate choice for the Carbuncle cup. Who needs more proof that its time to stop this silly waste of time and maybe also time to stop taking the BD too seriously.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I smell someone being bitter about once having been nominated...

    I think the Cup is valuable: architects, developers and clients should all be liable to being called to account when they come up with monstrosities like this.

    This is an act of vandalism of a national treasure: too right those responsible should be named and shamed.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I am totally behind Chris on this - what a ridiculous choice? Look around you there is crap being consented daily. Usual sensational crap from BD. Stuart Piercy

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 per page | 20 per page | 50 per page

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

sign in register
  • Email
  • Comments (76)
  • Save
Sign in

Email Newsletters

Sign out to login as another user

Desktop Site | Mobile Site