What’s in a name… Do the public really understand what it means to be an ‘architect’?

Ellie cropped

The current debate about protection of title is much more than a fight between the RIBA and the ARB. We need to learn from the mistakes of the past, says Eleanor Jolliffe

To be able to call oneself an architect implies being an individual with a rigorous technical and academic education with defined and supervised practical experience. To call oneself an architectural designer… that could be anyone with a sketch-up licence. Building Design readers know this – but does anyone else?

Aside from the possible commercial weight of the word “architect”, there is the emotional weight. Chris Williamson noted his sadness once he was removed from the register this month, and I understand this.

It is a word to which architects aspire from their mid-teens, a word they have battled financially and emotionally to use. It is a hard word to give up, or to admit that perhaps it has less meaning than we have convinced ourselves that it does.

This content is available to registered users | Already registered?Login here

You are not currently logged in.

To continue reading this story, sign up for free guest access

Existing Subscriber? LOGIN

REGISTER for free access on selected stories and sign up for email alerts. You get:

  • Up to the minute architecture news from around the UK
  • Breaking, daily and weekly e-newsletters

 

Subscribe to Building Design and you will benefit from:

Gated access promo

  • Unlimited news
  • Reviews of the latest buildings from all corners of the world
  • Technical studies
  • Full access to all our online archives
  • PLUS you will receive a digital copy of WA100 worth over £45

Subscribe now for unlimited access.