We’re so busy worrying about the impact of artificial intelligence on the profession, we neglect our own learning

Williamson_chris Dan Fontanelli

The irony of fears about the impact of AI on architecture is that the machines might be learning, but the architects are not, writes Chris Williamson

There simply isn’t a commitment to lifelong education in the profession. In contrast to Chat GPT’s voracious appetite to acquire knowledge, it’s possible to complete half of RIBA’s CPD requirement while eating sandwiches over 15 lunchtimes. There are few checks on the process and no evidence is required. Great if you’re busy, but who does the system really serve?

And if our clients and fellow consultants knew how flimsy our professional development was, would they trust us?

This content is available to registered users | Already registered?Login here

You are not currently logged in.

To continue reading this story, sign up for free guest access

Existing Subscriber? LOGIN

REGISTER for free access on selected stories and sign up for email alerts. You get:

  • Up to the minute architecture news from around the UK
  • Breaking, daily and weekly e-newsletters

 

Subscribe to Building Design and you will benefit from:

Gated access promo

  • Unlimited news
  • Reviews of the latest buildings from all corners of the world
  • Technical studies
  • Full access to all our online archives
  • PLUS you will receive a digital copy of WA100 worth over £45

Subscribe now for unlimited access.