Modernist dogma should not prevent us from rebuilding the Crooked House

2880px-Thecrookedhouse-2023-06

Source: Shutterstock

The belief that we must not reconstruct badly damaged buildings is based on outdated readings of Ruskin and William Morris, writes Andy Foster

The fire and demolition at the Glynne Arms – or as we all call it, the Crooked House – have revived the old debate about re-creating lost buildings. Andy Street the Mayor of West Midlands, among others, has called for the pub to be rebuilt brick by brick. Joe Holyoak in BD says that would produce a “worthless fake”.

It’s a measure of the resurgence of Modernism in the present century, that the idea that reinstatement is somehow morally wrong has come back, along with the condemnation of using traditional styles as ‘pastiche’. Twenty years ago, both had shrunk away so much that they were almost confined to lecturers in schools of architecture. Now they’re commonplace again, as they were forty or fifty years ago.

This content is available to registered users | Already registered?Login here

You are not currently logged in.

To continue reading this story, sign up for free guest access

Existing Subscriber? LOGIN

REGISTER for free access on selected stories and sign up for email alerts. You get:

  • Up to the minute architecture news from around the UK
  • Breaking, daily and weekly e-newsletters

 

Subscribe to Building Design and you will benefit from:

Gated access promo

  • Unlimited news
  • Reviews of the latest buildings from all corners of the world
  • Technical studies
  • Full access to all our online archives
  • PLUS you will receive a digital copy of WA100 worth over £45

Subscribe now for unlimited access.