Parliament refurb poses important questions about correct way to conserve architecture

Ellie cropped

The French achieved a stunning feat by rebuilding Notre Dame in an improbably short space of time. So why does the Palace of Westminster restoration seem so much harder, asks Eleanor Jolliffe

I recently spent a weekend in Paris. While there, we decided to queue to see the recently(ish) reopened Notre Dame. 

I spent the queue reading an article on Eugène-Emmanuel Viollet-le-Duc that I had been meaning to get to so entered the great cathedral feeling particularly thoughtful about the great conservation debate – to restore as was and risk fictionalising a building by choosing an imagined moment of perfection, or to stick rigidly to the The Society For The Protection Of Ancient Buildings (SPAB) approach, repairing in such a way that the fabric is protected and the full history is seen. (I’m great fun on holiday!).

This content is available to registered users | Already registered?Login here

You are not currently logged in.

To continue reading this story, sign up for free guest access

Existing Subscriber? LOGIN

REGISTER for free access on selected stories and sign up for email alerts. You get:

  • Up to the minute architecture news from around the UK
  • Breaking, daily and weekly e-newsletters

 

Subscribe to Building Design and you will benefit from:

Gated access promo

  • Unlimited news
  • Reviews of the latest buildings from all corners of the world
  • Technical studies
  • Full access to all our online archives
  • PLUS you will receive a digital copy of WA100 worth over £45

Subscribe now for unlimited access.