Why is Herzog and de Meuron submitting this bonkers proposal for Liverpool Street?

RiiSchroer1 reduced

Source: Rii Schroer

Herzog and de Meuron’s clumsy proposals for Liverpool Street do not sit easily with the practice’s wider body of work, writes Charles Saumarez Smith

I have been following the plans for the redevelopment of Liverpool Street Station with the utmost interest, partly because I remember, but only just, the last time there was a campaign to save it in the mid-1970s. It was in the early days of campaigning to preserve Victorian heritage, following the recognition of the importance of St. Pancras Station and growing awareness of the need to protect the working buildings and products of Victorian engineering, just as much as the cathedrals and country houses. 

The campaign was so successful that the new south entrance which was added in the 1980s was done in a historical style, so much so that people probably don’t realise that it is a modern addition.

This content is available to registered users | Already registered?Login here

You are not currently logged in.

To continue reading this story, sign up for free guest access

Existing Subscriber? LOGIN

REGISTER for free access on selected stories and sign up for email alerts. You get:

  • Up to the minute architecture news from around the UK
  • Breaking, daily and weekly e-newsletters

 

Subscribe to Building Design and you will benefit from:

Gated access promo

  • Unlimited news
  • Reviews of the latest buildings from all corners of the world
  • Technical studies
  • Full access to all our online archives
  • PLUS you will receive a digital copy of WA100 worth over £45

Subscribe now for unlimited access.