Is development on top of protected buildings really a good idea?
By Eleanor Jolliffe2024-05-16T05:00:00
As controversial schemes to build above listed structures proliferate, Eleanor Jolliffe asks whether the architects involved are putting profit before principle
In nearly ten years of writing columns for BD I have rarely, if ever, commented on architectural style. It’s not that I don’t have opinions. I just don’t believe everyone should share mine. Architectural principles are important but we can get too tangled in style wars and forget that streets and cities need some diversity. I think today I am as close as I have ever come of my self-imposed rule on commenting directly on another architect’s design.
I have recently seen a steady trickle of planning applications and press reports about building over historic buildings. I am not talking about sensitively employed rooftop extensions. I am talking about a building almost floating over a heritage asset. The most noted recent examples are Marron’s proposal for 80 Broad Street in Birmingham, or Herzog and de Meuron’s proposals for Liverpool Street Station in London.
…