What architects and politicians have in common

Eleanor Jolliffe

The two professions need to learn to communicate if we are to build a better future, says Eleanor Jolliffe as she starts a new series of columns

Architecture is a powerfully expressive art form, one used throughout history by powerful patrons seeking to impose ideals on an uncertain world with the reassuring solidity and permanence of bricks and stone.

All seven wonders of the world are architectural and 80% of the Unesco world heritage list is cultural – created as opposed to natural. More often than not, these lauded sites were originally intended to impart the lasting authority of a particular worldview on to human consciousness.

The Great Wall of China not only marked the country’s borders but demonstrated the might and power of the Ming Dynasty. The Statue of Liberty represents American freedom, patriotism and opportunity. And the Acropolis stands as a universal symbol of classical spirit and civilisation – the beginnings of western democracy. Our own Stonehenge communicates its message less clearly now than when it was built, but still holds a certain fascination and weight of authority in both the landscape and the national consciousness.

This content is available to registered users | Already registered?Login here

You are not currently logged in.

To continue reading this story, sign up for free guest access

Existing Subscriber? LOGIN

REGISTER for free access on selected stories and sign up for email alerts. You get:

  • Up to the minute architecture news from around the UK
  • Breaking, daily and weekly e-newsletters

 

Subscribe to Building Design and you will benefit from:

Gated access promo

  • Unlimited news
  • Reviews of the latest buildings from all corners of the world
  • Technical studies
  • Full access to all our online archives
  • PLUS you will receive a digital copy of WA100 worth over £45

Subscribe now for unlimited access.