Now is the time to take stock of architecture’s economic position

Ellie cropped

Architecture has in many ways typified the economic story of the UK since the Second World War. We are currently – and worryingly – becoming more and more exposed to global economic forces, writes Eleanor Jolliffe

We speak frequently in architecture about how poorly remunerated the work is. We speak of missing fee scales, a race to the bottom, undercutting, reduced demand, and being undervalued. In light of the renewed RIBA agendas around fees and protection of function, now seems to be an apposite moment to take stock of architecture’s economic position.

It is now old history that the Monopolies and Mergers Commission (MMC) required the RIBA to drop its fee scales in 1982. The RIBA then published “recommended”, followed by “indicative” fee scales in response. However, in 1992 an investigation by the Office for Fair Trading required the RIBA to also withdraw those.

This prohibition of any form of prescribed fees was reinforced in 1998 by the Competitions Act. All of these governmental policies were part of the socioeconomic drive for de-regulation and free market economics that has gripped British politics of all colours since the late 1980s.

This content is available to registered users | Already registered?Login here

You are not currently logged in.

To continue reading this story, sign up for free guest access

Existing Subscriber? LOGIN

REGISTER for free access on selected stories and sign up for email alerts. You get:

  • Up to the minute architecture news from around the UK
  • Breaking, daily and weekly e-newsletters

 

Subscribe to Building Design and you will benefit from:

Gated access promo

  • Unlimited news
  • Reviews of the latest buildings from all corners of the world
  • Technical studies
  • Full access to all our online archives
  • PLUS you will receive a digital copy of WA100 worth over £45

Subscribe now for unlimited access.