Grenfell Inquiry: Arconic ’did not withdraw combustible cladding because of cost implications’

2021-02-12T11:01:00

Sales manager made admission in secretly recorded phone call in the days after the 2017 fire

Arconic continued selling the combustible ACM cladding installed on Grenfell Tower after its test report had been withdrawn because of the “cost implications” of removing it from the market, the inquiry has heard.

Former Arconic sales manager Deborah French made the admission to John Simmons, who worked for one of the firm’s client’s Simco, shortly after the tragic 2017 fire in a telephone conversation which Simmons secretly recorded.

…

This content is available to registered users | Already registered?Login here

You are not currently logged in.

To continue reading this story, sign up for free guest access

Existing Subscriber? LOGIN

REGISTER for free access on selected stories and sign up for email alerts. You get:

Up to the minute architecture news from around the UK
Breaking, daily and weekly e-newsletters

Subscribe to Building Design and you will benefit from:

Unlimited news
Reviews of the latest buildings from all corners of the world
Technical studies
Full access to all our online archives
PLUS you will receive a digital copy of WA100 worth over £45

Grenfell Inquiry: Arconic ’did not withdraw combustible cladding because of cost implications’

This content is available to registered users | Already registered?Login here

To continue reading this story, sign up for free guest access

Subscribe now for unlimited access.