Heritage, sustainability, and dysfunction: the lessons of the M&S decision

Ben-Flatman-photo-cropped

The drawn-out battle over M&S’s Oxford Street site reflects systemic planning failures that must be addressed

The saga of Marks & Spencer’s redevelopment of its flagship Oxford Street store encapsulates the dysfunction and contradictions at the heart of the UK’s planning system. What began as a straightforward proposal to redevelop a prominent retail site has morphed into a symbol of broader failings in how we balance sustainability, heritage, and economic growth.

Marks & Spencer initially proposed demolishing its 1930s Orchard House building, along with adjacent structures, to construct a new 10-storey office block with ground-floor retail. The scheme, designed by Pilbrow & Partners, sought to address issues with the site, including poorly connected interiors, an unattractive undercroft on Orchard Street, and the low-quality urban environment on Granville Place.

This content is available to registered users | Already registered?Login here

You are not currently logged in.

To continue reading this story, sign up for free guest access

Existing Subscriber? LOGIN

REGISTER for free access on selected stories and sign up for email alerts. You get:

  • Up to the minute architecture news from around the UK
  • Breaking, daily and weekly e-newsletters

 

Subscribe to Building Design and you will benefit from:

Gated access promo

  • Unlimited news
  • Reviews of the latest buildings from all corners of the world
  • Technical studies
  • Full access to all our online archives
  • PLUS you will receive a digital copy of WA100 worth over £45

Subscribe now for unlimited access.