Stanton Williams’ Sainsbury Laboratory wins RIBA Stirling Prize

Full building credits and judges citation for the RIBA Stirling Prize winner:

Sainsbury Laboratory

Bateman Street, Cambridge

Architect:  Stanton Williams

Client:  University of Cambridge

Structural Engineer:  Adams Kara Taylor

Services Engineer:  Arup

Landscape:  Christopher Bradley-Hole and Schoenaich Landscape Architects

Contractor:  Kier Regional

Contract Value:  £69.0m

Date of completion:  January 2011

Gross internal area:  11,000 sq m

The judges chose the Sainsbury Laboratory because they were impressed by the building’s calm beauty.  This is a timeless piece of architecture, sitting within a highly sensitive site, one overlooking the woods where Darwin walked with his tutor and mentor Henslow, discussing the origin of species. In this project Stanton Williams and their landscape architects have created a new landscape, a courtyard which flows out into the botanical gardens. The project is both highly particular and specialised, and at the same time a universal building type, taken to an extraordinary degree of sophistication and beauty.

According to client David Sainsbury “scientists have traditionally put up with the most appalling conditions providing they are left alone to get on with their work. People have taken advantage of this.” The judges loved the fact that the project  celebrates the laboratory, an unloved type where boffins are thought never to look up from their experiments or talk to one another. It has given these scientists beautiful labs with lovely views and gorgeous top light, which produces an extraordinary quality of shadowless light on the working surface. In summary, a utilitarian building type has been elevated into the highest quality architecture, which communicates science as something glamorous and important.

The project seems simple, and this hides the fact that it was a hugely difficult building to achieve. It needed to provide flexibility for future changes in scientific practice, and it has achieved this brilliantly. The building had to balance openness with stringent requirements for security, which was done by placing the laboratories on the first floor, together with their own meeting places. Public access is on the ground floor in the form of a lecture theatre and meeting rooms, and, importantly, there is a charming café open to the public, which sits between the gardens and the lab’s private courtyard, and from which one can watch the goings-on within. This forms the buffer between the private and public zones.

The building uses fine materials expertly detailed; the judges loved the beautifully integrated works of art commissioned from Susanna Herron, William Pye and Norman Ackroyd. They were also impressed by the project’s profound sustainability, not only in terms of its excellent energy performance (BREEAM Excellent) but also in terms of its long term flexibility and adaptability. And they truly appreciated its classic timelessness.