facebook
Twitter
Linkedin
Feedback

Saturday02 August 2014

Audacious bid to add 11 storeys to London landmark

  • Email
  • Comments (10)
  • Save

KPF’s South Bank Tower extension would be a world first

Bold plans by KPF and engineer Adams Kara Taylor (AKT II) to extend one of London’s landmark buildings by more than a third have been recommended for approval by Southwark’s planners.

The proposal, to add 11 storeys to Richard Seifert’s 1972 King’s Reach Tower on the South Bank, is believed to be a world first.

KPF and the developer, CIT, claim they are fulfilling Seifert’s original vision for a more ambitious and elegant tower, but they admit they are also motivated by the need to compete with a rash of newly consented towers that will soon rise around it.

South Bank Tower

The existing tower

“This has never been done before,” said Albert Taylor, founding director at AKT II, which pored over 10,000 of Arup’s original drawings and added a similar number of its own.

“It’s incredibly complicated but actually the biggest challenge was people’s attitudes,” he said. “We’re lucky to have a client with vision. Why shouldn’t a building that’s part of London’s heritage last another 80 years when all youneed is to pump it with steroids?”

The extra 11 storeys is the equivalent of adding AHMM’s new Google headquarters or Chipperfield’s Elizabeth House on the existing building.

KPF's South Bank Tower proposal

KPF’s South Bank Tower proposal

Bob Lang, a tall building expert and structural engineer at Arup, said: “It’s not the easiest thing to do. The whole thing is driven by value but if spending the money on strengthening works is worth it then I imagine a lot more people will start asking the question: is it possible?”

Taylor suggested Seifert’s more famous Tower 42, just across the Thames, was another contender for an extension. There were clear financial and environmental advantages in not demolishing existing buildings, he said.

King’s Reach Tower has consent for an extra six storeys — and Make got planning for four in 2005. But Taylor is convinced the foundations are strong enough for a more significant growth spurt.

If approved by Southwark Council on Tuesday, the 30-storey building, rebranded South Bank Tower, will rise to 155m. This will bring it within 15m of Ian Simpson’s long-delayed One Blackfriars, and the tallest of nine PLP towers planned to the east.

The area at the northern end of Blackfriars Road has been earmarked for a tall building cluster. AHMM’s 20-storey block on the corner of Southwark Street has topped out and Lifschutz Davidson Sandilands’ 144m Doon Street tower is taking shape nearby.

KPF’s design and access statement said: “The applicant has studied the implications of these developments and the presence of the King’s Reach Tower in the emerging context and has concluded that a number of factors make a further extension to the tower not only viable but desirable from townscape and policy perspectives alike.”

Simpson said it was clearly a commercial decision but agreed it would result in a more elegant building.

 

Share

Readers' comments (10)

  • heroic

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • A before picture would have been nice

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • No

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Its a David party

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • If the original foundations are up to it, better not mention that to the original client!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Seymour Alexander

    Wonder what it would look like if Zaha Hadid had got the task of extending the tower.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • @seymour......probably awesome

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Why are we all STILL getting excited about these unsustainable, all-glass buildings? What are the u values of those glazed facades? How expensive are they? and their embodied carbon?? Air conditioned in the summer? Naturally ventilated? Jeah, right. And what of all the resources and energy poured into those c10,000+ new drawings. All printed with recycled paper, right? Heroic. And blinded.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • @Richard...well said.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I think keeping the existing building rather than knocking it down and building something new probably saves more energy than is spent on 10,000 new drawings

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

sign in register
  • Email
  • Comments (10)
  • Save
Latest
News
Sign in

Email Newsletters

Sign out to login as another user

I'm searching for in
Desktop Site | Mobile Site