facebook
Twitter
Linkedin
Feedback

Tuesday22 August 2017

Architects stage protest against Housing & Planning Bill

  • Email
  • Comments (14)
  • Save

Demonstration outside Parliament from 1pm today

Peter Barber Architects and the lobby group Architects for Social Housing are set to take part in a protest against the Housing & Planning Bill outside Parliament today.

Around 50 resident, activist and political groups - including RUSS, the community land trust project designed by Architype and Jon Broome Architects - were due to stage the rally from 1pm as the bill, which they describe as “one of the most dangerous and far-reaching”, receives its third reading in the Commons.

They described it as duplicitous legislation which rather than tackling the housing crisis was “designed to bring about the end of social housing in this country”.

In a statement it said: “The bill’s model of home building is driven by state-subsidised incentives for private investors that will increase, rather than check, existing speculation on the property market.

“Under the tattered banner of austerity, the Housing & Planning Bill is in reality legislation for the social cleansing of London in particular, and more generally for the further dismantling of the welfare state by this Conservative government.”

The groups warned of “catastrophic consequences” and called for “secure and genuinely affordable social housing for all”.

Architects have already spoken out about their fears that the bill is a retrograde step for everyone apart from investors. In a comment piece for BD, Julia Park of Levitt Bernstein criticised it for doing nothing to tackle the issues underlying the housing crisis.

 

Protestors’ statement

The Housing & Planning Bill is one of the most dangerous and far-reaching pieces of legislation passed in this country in a long time, yet its true impact has been unreported in the mainstream press and is largely unknown to the people it will most affect. Far from addressing the so-called housing ‘crisis’, it has been designed to bring about the end of social housing in this country. To call it a Housing Bill doesn’t do justice to the real scope of its ambitions. The intrusive new measures it introduces for monitoring social housing tenants, and the centralisation of power in the Secretary of State it will effect, makes the Bill a social engineering plan that will have catastrophic consequences for the people of Britain.

If this Bill had been written to do what the government is presenting it as doing – helping people to get on the property ladder, freeing up existing social housing for those most in need, cutting bureaucracy on planning permission – it would merely be a deeply misinformed piece of legislation that has taken no account of existing conditions in housing. But it isn’t that. It is, in fact, an extremely subtle and duplicitous piece of legislation that in almost every aspect does something very different, if not the direct opposite, of what it is claiming to do. If passed, the Housing & Planning Bill will:

1) Replace the obligation to build homes for social rent with a duty to build discounted ‘starter homes’ capped at £450,000 in Greater London and £250,000 across the rest of England, in effect offering state subsidies for private investors, who may then sell their assets at full market value within five years of their purchase;

2) Extend the Right to Buy to housing associations without any provision for their replacement with like for like, effectively overseeing the further decline in the number of homes for social rent;

3) Compel local authorities to sell ‘high value’ housing, thereby exploiting London’s exaggerated property values either to transfer public housing into private hands or to free up its coveted land for property developers;

4) Force so-called ‘high income’ tenants with a total household income over £30,000 in England and £40,000 in London to pay market rents, targeting low-paid working families, those on the minimum wage or claiming disability allowances who cannot afford either to Pay to Stay in their existing homes or to exercise their Right to Buy;

5) Grant planning permission in principle for housing estates designated as such to be redeveloped as ‘brownfield land’, a term usually used to describe former industrial or commercial land that requires cleaning up, but applied here (as it has been by the Housing and Planning Minister and the Conservative candidate for London Mayor) to the communities that live on these estates;

6) Phase out secure tenancies and their succession to children and replace them with 2-5 year tenancies, after which tenants will have to reapply, with such tenancies also being applied to tenants who have been ‘decanted’ for the purposes of the demolition and redevelopment of their estates.

Rather than alleviating the housing ‘crisis’, either by building genuinely affordable homes or by increasing provision of social housing, the Bill seeks to use that crisis for political and financial ends. On the one hand it forces local housing authorities to implement Conservative housing policy, and on the other it takes planning power away from those authorities. Both these hands, the one compelling, the other taking, are wielded by what, if the Bill is passed, will be new and punitive powers of the Secretary of State, not only against the people who rely on social housing for a home, but also against the councils and housing associations that provide them.

There is absolutely nothing in the Bill for the provision of social housing. Instead, it introduces legislation by which existing social housing is to be either sold into private ownership or demolished to make way for new developments. The Bill’s model of home building is driven by state subsidised incentives for private investors that will increase, rather than check, existing speculation on the property market. Under the tattered banner of austerity, the Housing and Planning Bill is in reality legislation for the social cleansing of London in particular, and more generally for the further dismantling of the welfare state by this Conservative government.

During its passage through the House of Commons Public Bill Committee, over 150 written submissions were made to Parliament voicing concerns about its legislation and their consequences. None of these altered the contents of the Bill in any meaningful way up to the report stage. Instead, the government has responded by making plans to fast track the Bill into law. When the democratic process fails, as it so clearly has here, it is our duty to take other measures to make ourselves heard. The Bill will receive its third reading in the Commons on Tuesday, 5 January, 2016, after which it passes to the House of Lords. Numerous groups from the housing sector, the trades unions and beyond will be demonstrating from 1pm at the Houses of Parliament against the Housing & Planning Bill and for secure and genuinely affordable social housing for all. Please join us.

Architects for Social Housing

Barnet Housing Action Group

Basingdon and Southend Housing Action

Brick Lane Debates

Brighton Benefits Campaign

Brighton Homelessness Action Group

Brighton and Hove Left Unity

Brighton People’s Assembly Against Austerity

Brixton Rebels

Case Central Brighton

Coalition of Resistance: Can’t Pay, Won’t Pay

Class War

Communities Against Gentrificleansing

Corbyn Community Dorset

Coventry Momentum

Digs Hackney Renters

Dorset People’s Assembly

Fairhazel Cooperative Ltd.

Fight for Aylesbury

Focus E15 Mothers

Fred John Towers

Green Citizen Engagement

Hackney Solidarity Network

Haringey Left Unity

Homeless London

Housing Action Southwark and Lambeth

Housing Bill Action

Jewish Socialists Group

Kennington Park Estate TRA

Kilburn Unemployed Workers Group

Lambeth Housing Activists

Lewisham Green Party

London Coalition Against Poverty

Love Activists Brighton

Momentum Barnet

Momentum City of London

Momentum Oxford

No Fixed Abode Anti-Fascists

Norfolk People’s Assembly

Not Just One Mum Camden

Occupy Barnet

Occupy Democracy Brighton

Our Grahame Park

Our Tottenham

Our West Hendon

Our Whitefield Estate

Oxford People’s Assembly

Oxfordshire Anti-Bedroom Tax

Oxfordshire Unison Health Branch 

Oxford University Socialist Worker Student Society

People’s Housing Conference

Peter Barber Architects

Radical Assembly

Radical Housing Network

Red Labour Reading

Reclaim Hackney

Reclaim Tower Hamlets

Rent Control for the UK

Revolutionary Communist Group

Rural Urban Synthesis Society

Save Central Hill Community

Save Cressingham Gardens 

Southwark Defend Council Housing

Southwark Green Party

Streets Kitchen

Sussex Defend Our NHS

Sweets Way Resists

Thetra Tulse Hill TRA

Unite the Union

Wandsworth Green Party

 

 

Share

Readers' comments (14)

  • The Government's current Housing and Planning Bill has echoes of Westminster City Council's notorious "Homes for Votes" scandal of the 1980's. This time, however, the Government seems to be doing a similar thing at a national rather than a local level.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • SomeoneStoleMyNick

    I note that the excellent Peter Barber Architects is the ONLY practice that has the balls to put its name to this protest. Well done not only for being the best housing architects in the country, but also for putting yourselves on the line.

    Now I wonder where Richard Rogers is......

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • SomeoneStoleMyNick

    Penoyre and Prasad....Ash Sakula.....all those architects who "care".....

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Details of the protest's location can be found here: https://www.facebook.com/events/514234278756465/
    The page also contains a list of the 150 organisations and individuals that submitted written submissions to the House of Commons Public Bill Committee about the Housing & Planning Bill. It includes the RIBA and Levitt Bernstein.

    Elizabeth Hopkirk, BD

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • So, not that dissimilar to what the Health and Social Care Act 2012 has done for the NHS, although feedback and effects are immediate and direct when it comes to housing.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • SSMN, are you going?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • SomeoneStoleMyNick

    No - I can't, unfortunately -

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Perhaps those you are criticising can't..unfortunately.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • SomeoneStoleMyNick

    Damn. I made the mistake of thinking your question was sincere.

    Those architects could have signed the document. Some of them like to parade their social conscience at every opportunity.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Clichy

    @SoupDragon
    Excellent question!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 per page | 20 per page

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

sign in register
  • Email
  • Comments (14)
  • Save
Latest
News
Sign in

Email Newsletters

Sign out to login as another user

Desktop Site | Mobile Site