Does the US approach to planning mean architects get more respect in America?

Chris Fogarty Headshot_cropped

In his first column for BD, New York-based Chris Fogarty assesses the relative merits of the US and UK planning systems

Recently, I was traveling with an old college friend who owns an architecture firm in London. After finishing a long and frustrating call with a local planning officer regarding a new housing project, he vented that the UK planning process has led to a general lack of respect for the architectural profession. When I mentioned that New York has no formal design review process at all for new buildings, he was blown away. It made me wonder: How did we come to have completely different systems for our city planning, and is one better than the other?

In the UK, the 1947 Town and Planning Act nationalised the right to develop land. Planning authorities oversee local development plans which serve as guidelines and inform decision-making in relation to scale and visual impact. Applications are reviewed by the Planning Officer and approved by a Planning Committee.

This content is available to registered users | Already registered?Login here

You are not currently logged in.

To continue reading this story, sign up for free guest access

Existing Subscriber? LOGIN

REGISTER for free access on selected stories and sign up for email alerts. You get:

  • Up to the minute architecture news from around the UK
  • Breaking, daily and weekly e-newsletters

 

Subscribe to Building Design and you will benefit from:

Gated access promo

  • Unlimited news
  • Reviews of the latest buildings from all corners of the world
  • Technical studies
  • Full access to all our online archives
  • PLUS you will receive a digital copy of WA100 worth over £45

Subscribe now for unlimited access.