- Home
- Intelligence for Architects
- Subscribe
- Jobs
- Events
2025 events calendar Explore now Keep up to date
Find out more
- Programmes
- CPD
- More from navigation items
As infill housing reshapes council estates, questions arise about the loss of green spaces and amenities. Rory Olcayto advocates for infill and resident-led design as a way to meet housing needs while preserving community spirit
Infilling council estates with new housing is contentious. If you live in a garden-less flat in a dense, polluted part of town, you might argue it’s wrong to reduce communal green space for a few extra homes. But with private developers failing to deliver enough social housing, even on large, ex-council sites, infill housing offers local authorities a way to cut waiting lists.
Trevor Morriss explores this dilemma in his recent article for BD, warning that faith in infill homes as a housing crisis fix could sacrifice community spaces and social infrastructure in the rush to densify urban neighbourhoods. He highlighted six homes planned for a ‘village green’ on a small estate in south London, where a community centre and children’s play space would be demolished. Morriss argues this compromises an ‘already limited local amenity,’ concluding that ‘homes on their own do not make a community.’ He calls instead for solutions that balance housing delivery with the social infrastructure residents need.
…
You are not currently logged in.
Existing Subscriber? LOGIN
REGISTER for free access on selected stories and sign up for email alerts. You get:
Subscribe to Building Design and you will benefit from: