- Home
- Intelligence for Architects
- Subscribe
- Jobs
- Events

2025 events calendar Explore now 
Keep up to date
Find out more
- Programmes
- CPD
- More from navigation items
As the industry splinters into ever smaller specialisms, Eleanor Jolliffe asks how we can foster more effective collaboration and greater honesty about learning from mistakes
It is not news that architecture and construction are becoming ever more fractured and ever more disparate industries. For another writing project I am working on, I have recently been considering the make-up of the project team. It starts simply enough: client, architect, quantity surveyor, contractor, sub-contractors, structural and MEP engineers; then come the almost essential nice-to-haves for projects of any scale - project manager, fire engineer, planning consultant; then I remember the statutory necessary roles - CDMPD and BRPD.
On top of this, the list of other specialists I have worked with begins to grow and grow - waterproofing consultants, façade and acoustic engineers, accessibility advisers, retail enlivenment consultants(!) and façade access consultants. I won’t continue, but I could fill my column word count with consultant lists alone.
…
You are not currently logged in.
Existing Subscriber? LOGIN
REGISTER for free access on selected stories and sign up for email alerts. You get:
Subscribe to Building Design and you will benefit from:
