Tinkers, tailors or candlestick makers: Who should design the Northern House of Lords?

Tom Brooksbank

The opportunities of post-Brexit Britain will be claimed by architectural pragmatists, argues Tom Brooksbank

The government’s announcement that it is looking at moving the House of Lords north to York has been dismissed by peers as “completely ridiculous” and showing “contempt for the constitution.”

And while it seems likely that the idea is more of a Dominic Cummings PR ruse than a serious proposal there is something rather delicious, in this age of anti-establishment disruption, about the horror which the prospect of moving north has elicited from the likes of Lord Forsyth and Admiral Lord West.

It’s also far from certain whether a sudden influx of 795 disgruntled fuddy-duddies would benefit the north of England in any meaningful way. But it makes for an interesting architectural provocation all the same. There are plenty of repositories of centralised state power, other than the upper chamber, which could, and should, be moved from London to the regions.

This is premium content. 

Only logged in subscribers have access to it.

Login or SUBSCRIBE to view this story

Gated access promo

Existing subscriber? LOGIN

A subscription to Building Design will provide:

  • Unlimited architecture news from around the UK
  • Reviews of the latest buildings from all corners of the world
  • Our monthly digital edition including stunning photos, building and technical studies
  • Full access to all our online archives
  • PLUS you will receive a print copy of WA100 worth over £30 when it is published in December.

Subscribe now for unlimited access.

Alternatively REGISTER for free access on selected stories and sign up for email alerts