A good architect should be a polymath more than a specialist

Ellie cropped

If we lose our wider intellectual curiosity, we loss the essence of what it is to be in this profession, Eleanor Jolliffe writes

My attention was caught recently by a post on LinkedIn from Alex Ely of Mae. In it he refers to one of the conclusions which Paul Crosby and I drew in our book on the history of architectural practice – that architects often struggle to define their role and value; along with pieces recently published in Time magazine, and by Martyn Evans in BD.

Ely observes the realisation coming from both inside and outside the profession of architecture that something is going wrong in the way we build buildings; suggesting that in the UK we have built a sophisticated system for delivering buildings but no longer consistently deliver places, or value those who shape them.

This content is available to registered users | Already registered?Login here

You are not currently logged in.

To continue reading this story, sign up for free guest access

Existing Subscriber? LOGIN

REGISTER for free access on selected stories and sign up for email alerts. You get:

  • Up to the minute architecture news from around the UK
  • Breaking, daily and weekly e-newsletters

 

Subscribe to Building Design and you will benefit from:

Gated access promo

  • Unlimited news
  • Reviews of the latest buildings from all corners of the world
  • Technical studies
  • Full access to all our online archives
  • PLUS you will receive a digital copy of WA100 worth over £45

Subscribe now for unlimited access.