Report comment

Looks like a well executed and interesting building, but I would say that it is deeply fashionable rather than unfashionable. As a corrective to the claim that this is a future listed building, let me add the following: the difficult context has lead to a building of some spacial complexity and there is some curiously incoherent, even picturesque / arbitrary (it seems to me) material treatment of the volumes. beyond this, and the quality of the exection (for which the contractor has to take some credit doesn't he?) it is difficult to see what there is here beyond the patina of modernity, rather transparently representing, as this does a conflation of familiar influences; Fretton, O'Donnell + Tuomey and of course Chipperfield. Would it be too unkind to say that this is a kind of 'poor man's version of all the above named? If this is the case, that still means that we have a good building on our hands, although clearly not one that moves things forward in terms of architectural solution, unlike some of the recent work of, say, Caruso St John, or indeed Chipperfield (particularly in its competition proposal for the LSE building which lost out to O'Donnell + Tuomey. So lets have a little bit of perspective.