Report comment

Please fill in the form to report an unsuitable comment. Please state which comment is of concern and why. It will be sent to our moderator for review.

Comment

This is hugely polarising issue. As it stands, the NIST report is held up as the most exhaustive and credible explanation for the alarmingly fast global collapse of these massive buildings, the conclusion being that it was a result of impact damage and fire. If these conclusions were endorsed and peer reviewed by a world class Structural Engineering firm such as Ove Arup and Partners, it would lay the issue to rest once and for all. Until that happens, it is inevitable that questions will remain. I am quite surprised BD that you have given coverage to a journalist who specialises in writing about Conspiracy Theories here, when you could have asked a top Structural Engineer to refute the evidence instead.

Your details

Cancel