Report comment

I consider myself a scholar on le-corbusier and one thing i understand is that his architecture was never static. His style changed drastically over the years in retrospect to his ever discerning studies of what his architecture is and what should be. Preservation does not mean the site should be as is but allowed to grow and age and rejuvinate as time passes, just like any thing else in nature. that is true preservation. I don't think le corbusier would want his master piece turned into a museum showcased piece, that's not what his architecture is about. I have not seen any evidence in Piano's design that marrs the nature of ronchamps. i would say, well done sir, and go ahead. And let's try to keep politics out of this