Report comment

I recently engaged in a debate via email with Vaizey, sufficient to say his arguments fell apart pretty quickly, and he was unable to provide proof for his arguments, and after a short while in which he seemed to become increasingly more frustrated(excesive use of exclamation marks for example), he ceased replying. I must say, It is quite bad when a politician is unable to hold an argument against a 16 year old boy. His arguments, and those of English Heritage, UNESCO and the Conservatives are so poor that they will never stand in a proper debate with anyone who actually knows anything about the current situation of tall buildings in London. I have still seen NO proof to back them up. I enjoyed and applaud your recent article 'Stuck in the old buffer zone', we need more positive articles regarding this situation. The attacking parties need to realise they are not speakin for the majority of people of London, or this country.