Why protecting the function of architects is a matter of public safety

Jason Boyle

Protecting the function of architects is not just about safeguarding the profession – it is about protecting the public from unsafe, unregulated, and unsustainable construction practices, writes Jason Boyle

The UK’s built environment is facing a crisis, one that has already cost lives. The Grenfell Tower fire in 2017 was a devastating example of what happens when safety is compromised. Seventy-two people lost their lives in a building that should have been their safe haven. The public was failed at every level, including by those responsible for designing and overseeing the refurbishment.

An architect was appointed for the project, but the tragedy highlighted systemic failures in procurement, regulation, and oversight – where cost-cutting, fragmented responsibility, and poor coordination played a significant role. One of the root causes was the erosion of clear professional accountability in design and construction.

This content is available to registered users | Already registered?Login here

You are not currently logged in.

To continue reading this story, sign up for free guest access

Existing Subscriber? LOGIN

REGISTER for free access on selected stories and sign up for email alerts. You get:

  • Up to the minute architecture news from around the UK
  • Breaking, daily and weekly e-newsletters

 

Subscribe to Building Design and you will benefit from:

Gated access promo

  • Unlimited news
  • Reviews of the latest buildings from all corners of the world
  • Technical studies
  • Full access to all our online archives
  • PLUS you will receive a digital copy of WA100 worth over £45

Subscribe now for unlimited access.