Why architects need to prove their worth – and charge for it

20240308_092230

How can architects justify charging more? Matt Thompson argues that proving their worth is the first step to solving the fees crisis

We hear that architects often resort to either buying jobs or at least flaying the flesh off their fees’ bones just to stay alive. Cutthroat price-slashing. Race to the bottom. Call it what you will.

I’ve heard this so often over so many years now – the latest time being in a recent Building Design piece by Nicholas Jewell – that I’ve internalised it as an eternal truth.

If it is true (and it probably is – no smoke without fire, they say), then it stinks.

And yet, no client wants a poor-quality service from their architect. No client has the power to compel architects to drop their fees, and you can’t blame them for going with the most economic option.

This content is available to registered users | Already registered?Login here

You are not currently logged in.

To continue reading this story, sign up for free guest access

Existing Subscriber? LOGIN

REGISTER for free access on selected stories and sign up for email alerts. You get:

  • Up to the minute architecture news from around the UK
  • Breaking, daily and weekly e-newsletters

 

Subscribe to Building Design and you will benefit from:

Gated access promo

  • Unlimited news
  • Reviews of the latest buildings from all corners of the world
  • Technical studies
  • Full access to all our online archives
  • PLUS you will receive a digital copy of WA100 worth over £45

Subscribe now for unlimited access.