We need to retain more of our existing built environment, but not through a Grade III listing

Liz Smith Purcell small

Liz Smith explains why Grade III Listing is the right conversation, but not the right solution

The concept of a new ‘Grade III’ listing was publicly introduced by Will Arnold, from the Institute of Structural Engineers. The aim is to save significant amounts of carbon by legislating to make reuse – rather than demolition – the default option throughout our industry. Picked up widely across the press and supported by TV personality Kevin McCloud, this debate has breached its typically esoteric commentary and brought national attention to the subject.

This proposal would give every existing building a mandatory Grade III listing, starting with those of a net internal area of more than 1,000m2. Proposals for replacing an existing structure would need permission to demolish, first proving there is no viable retrofit solution.

This content is available to registered users | Already registered?Login here

You are not currently logged in.

To continue reading this story, sign up for free guest access

Existing Subscriber? LOGIN

REGISTER for free access on selected stories and sign up for email alerts. You get:

  • Up to the minute architecture news from around the UK
  • Breaking, daily and weekly e-newsletters

 

Subscribe to Building Design and you will benefit from:

Gated access promo

  • Unlimited news
  • Reviews of the latest buildings from all corners of the world
  • Technical studies
  • Full access to all our online archives
  • PLUS you will receive a digital copy of WA100 worth over £45

Subscribe now for unlimited access.