Is this what you mean by transparency on viability, RBKC?

Emma Dent Coad

There is a desperate shortage of affordable housing in Kensington and the council is planning to build some beside Trellick Tower. But Emma Dent Coad has some unanswered questions

Since the atrocity of the Grenfell Tower fire, Kensington & Chelsea council (RBKC) has been subjected to deep scrutiny over its policies and practices. This has led to no fewer than five critical reports from the government-appointed independent Grenfell Taskforce, acres of negative press coverage and a second critical audit of behind-closed-doors property transactions. Published last month, this looked in detail at four controversial deals in the north of the borough and found instances of the council breaching its own policies and local plan.

All of this has resulted, quite properly, in a deluge of charters, commitments and guarantees from the council to do better, to communicate with openness and transparency and to listen and not just hear residents’ concerns. A new golden era for RBKC and its residents!

In the light of this Damascene conversion, residents in Golborne ward are quite correctly demanding that the council lives up to its commitments, in this instance in the very sensitive and controversial site directly in front of Trellick Tower.

This is premium content. 

Only logged in subscribers have access to it.

Login or SUBSCRIBE to view this story

Gated access promo

Existing subscriber? LOGIN

A subscription to Building Design will provide:

  • Unlimited architecture news from around the UK
  • Reviews of the latest buildings from all corners of the world
  • Full access to all our online archives
  • PLUS you will receive a digital copy of WA100 worth over £45.

Subscribe now for unlimited access.

Alternatively REGISTER for free access on selected stories and sign up for email alerts