Campaigners challenge carbon-cost figures for DSDHA tower

One_Museum_Street

Source: DSDHA

Group says demolition of Bloomsbury landmark would generate 64,000 tonnes of emissions over 60 years

Opponents of DSDHA-designed proposals to redevelop the site of a disused hotel in Bloomsbury with a much taller tower claim the project team has used carbon-cost figures that “grossly misrepresent” reality in its planning application, an accusation the developer refutes.

The Save Museum Street and Climate Emergency Camden groups say their concerns about the plans to demolish 17-storey Selkirk House in Museum Street are underpinned by research by former Stirling Prize sustainability advisor Simon Sturgis’ Targeting Zero consultancy.

DSDHA’s mixed-use proposals for LabTech, would replace Selkirk House – once the head office of Trusthouse Forte and more recently a Travelodge – with a 21-storey office block that also features apartments on its highest levels.

This content is available to registered users | Already registered?Login here

You are not currently logged in.

To continue reading this story, sign up for free guest access

Existing Subscriber? LOGIN

REGISTER for free access on selected stories and sign up for email alerts. You get:

  • Up to the minute architecture news from around the UK
  • Breaking, daily and weekly e-newsletters

 

Subscribe to Building Design and you will benefit from:

Gated access promo

  • Unlimited news
  • Reviews of the latest buildings from all corners of the world
  • Technical studies
  • Full access to all our online archives
  • PLUS you will receive a digital copy of WA100 worth over £45

Subscribe now for unlimited access.