Robin Hood Gardens design competition: The results

27 June, 2008

Tower Hamlets Council, which owns the estate, together with English Partnerships, propose to demolish the estate to make way for 3,000 new homes. This is on the grounds that not only are the Smithsons-designed blocks past saving, but residents also voted for demolition, although refurbishment has since been costed as the cheaper option.

Zoran Radivojevic’s winning scheme in our ideas competition shows how the buildings’ powerful urban form can easily withstand some quite radical intervention. And this idea — that the buildings can act as a fulcrum for further development — was a theme that ran through a number of the entries.

But the contest raised other issues, namely that 20th century buildings are far more capable of sustaining radical intervention than those of the 19th and 20th centuries.

While many of the architects treated the two blocks with reverence, the more successful entries in the judges’ view were less nervous about cutting through the blocks to make them more permeable, or hanging additional structure off the facades to animate them and make the occupancy of the blocks more readable.

The competition also disapproves the claim by Tower Hamlets Council and English Partnerships that the buildings have to be demolished in order to achieve the required density levels.

A number of proposals added dwellings ranged east-west at the northern end of the site, or added housing to close both ends of the site and create more of a courtyard, minimising overlooking and maximising security.

One of the most obvious problems of the existing blocks is the failure of the Smithsons’ “streets in the sky”. The balconies are too narrow, and a number of entries proposed making them wider and greener — more hedges than streets.

Almost all the entries preserved the central green space, while the most convincing recognised that its function, as a kind of a green lung for the estate, should be allowed to spread or percolate through new residential blocks.

Finally, the entries makes a convincing argument that the estate’s problems are nothing to do with the architecture but are down to a lack of vision by its owners. This is why the judges liked the proposal to move the buildings to west London, putting it in an environment where, watched over by Goldfinger’s Trellick Tower, the equally iconic Robin Hood immediately feels more at home.

WInner: Zoran Radivojevic Cazenove Architects

Credit: Zoran Radivojevic

The buildings are treated as giant carcasses that allow parts of the structure to be removed and new, lighter structures to be added. These extensions could house work studios or retail space. Some flats are also removed and the hollows used either as public space or let out as business units. Circulation is via a new set of externally attached ramps and stairwells.

Zoran Radivojevic design in depth

Second place: Bruce Newlands Kraft Architecture & Mike Hyatt Landscape Architects

An engineered timber skin envelops one side of the existing blocks, providing more generous terrace space. It also extends upwards, creating an extra two storeys of community space on the roof. There are a total of 2,500 homes, a mix of high-density, low-rise housing, together with low-rise commercial and community facilities.

Third place: Ben Addy Moxon Architects

The architect wants to have as little impact as possible on the Smithsons’ masterplan, maintaining the green space and turning existing thoroughfares into tree-lined avenues. The concrete acoustic barrier on the eastern side is removed to open up the streetscape with retail units, cafés and market stalls. New medium- and low-rise blocks have planted facades and window boxes.
Ben Addy design in depth

And the Runners-up are ...

Sabah Ashiq

The scheme focuses on creating better pedestrian access through the site and removing the boundary wall so the estate is no longer so isolated. The blocks are renovated, and glass and voids are used to reflect the new spatial qualities. Extra one- and two-bedroom flats are added to the blocks.

Tommaso Passalacqua Brre Architects with Baires Raffaelli, Elio Rava and Carlos Acostaf

An “equipment wall” is plugged onto the Smithsons’ building, “parasite” houses are built on the roof and a block of capsule houses is added to one end of the site to reach the required density.

Tom Jefferies Maccreanor Lavington

The architect proposes moving the blocks to west London to a site more receptive to its uncompromising architectural language. By placing it next to Goldfinger’s Trellick Tower, the original dialogue between RHG and the nearby listed grade II listed Balfron Tower is restated and strengthened. The vacant site would then become the subject of an international housing competition.

Carsten Czaja LIVFE Design Agency, Berlin

The buildings are wrapped in a glass screen. The approach to the Blackwall Tunnel is covered to allow for 350 new units, seven floors in height. A further 560 units are provided in freestanding towers at the eastern end of the site.

Mark NG and Jimmy Hung Make

The buildings are given an instant face-lift by being repaired and painted, in a manner similar to London’s Brunswick Centre. Trees are used around the site to create an acoustic barrier, while the existing green space becomes a leisure ground, complete with ferris wheel. A new retail promenade is located at the site’s eastern end, leading to a high-density residential development.

Harry Dobbs Harry Dobbs Design

The blocks are made more permeable at their joining points so they can become more part the surrounding streetscape. It also means that flats can be accessed by stairs and lifts from each side of the blocks, The original staircase have been cut out and lighter new stairwells inserted. They reach right up to the roof entering through a roof garden shed structure where residents will alos be offered an allotment.

Matteo Cainer Fletcher Priest Architects

The architect decided that the estate’s main flaw is the lack of community and interactive spaces, and that its regeneration should be guided by community needs. New spaces inserted as bubbles within the main frame give additional meeting spaces and facilities. There are proposals to create a series of new pathways across the site, which would be intersected by extra recreational space.

Get the latest stories first with BD newsletters. Click to signup
							WHAT ARE THESE?

| DISCUSS IN BD'S FORUM | SUBSCRIBE TO BD

---

We want to hear from you
You can be as critical or controversial as you like, but please don't get personal or offensive, and do keep it brief and relevant. Remember this is for feedback and constructive discussion!
Comments may be edited if they do not meet these guidelines.

Tell us what you think

You must fill in all fields marked *

Story date 27 June, 2008

This field is for security, please leave blank.

Your Name*

Your Email*

Comment*