‘It’s a great place to live, absolutely’
29 February 2008
Local residents give their views of what it’s like to live in Robin Hood Gardens, one of the 20th century’s great housing estates. Depressing? Not at all, they tell Rory Olcayto
High up on the fifth floor of Robin Hood Gardens, resident Shirley Magnitsky cuts short a relaxing Saturday afternoon bath to set the record straight about “the regeneration nonsense” planned for her estate.
The 62-year-old minicab controller has lived in her split-level maisonette for the past 13 years, “When I was decanted from my previous home, I could have had a brand new house anywhere in Tower Hamlets,” she says. “But I chose to live here.”
“Look out my kitchen window, what do you see? Trees, grass, very pleasant surroundings. It’s a great place to live, absolutely. This is the most peaceful part of the borough with plenty of facilities.”
She is scathing about the Blackwall Reach Regeneration Project, which covers Robin Hood Gardens, and blames poor maintenance for many of the buildings’ problems. “It’s got nothing to do with the design. The homes are run down because the council won’t spend money on them. This is a prime spot. That’s why they want to build 3,000 more homes here. The whole thing is about location and money.”
She says that many residents share her views but that most were hoodwinked into favouring demolition, either because the council’s consultants linked demolition to the promise of new homes, or because those who signed up thought it was the only way to guarantee their rights as council tenants.

‘English Partnerships wants to clear the site quickly to increase density’
Phil Briscoe, local councillor
Magnitsky’s fears are confirmed by local councillor Phil Briscoe. While not a fan of the estate’s architecture, he argues that its poor maintenance, which has helped give Robin Hood Gardens a bad image, is now being used as a reason for demolition.
“Underlying the whole exercise is the desire to get as much density on the site as possible and the consultation was geared to that end,” Briscoe explains. “English Partnerships wants to clear the site as quickly as possible to increase density.”
He is critical of the current plan to put in 3,000 residential units, some in high rise towers. “It’s not good planning as far as I am concerned; we already have 8,000 units in the pipeline for the area. There has to be a limit to how much we can squeeze in. There’s a real danger of overdoing it and not creating a sustainable community in the long term.
“There are significant problems with the estate: dampness, loose cables. These are maintenance issues partly, but I’m not backing demolition. I just want the best solution for the tenants, and new build would be unlikely to meet the same space standards.”
And while this part of the capital has been mistakenly written off as an urban dead zone, Robin Hood Gardens now stands on some of the most valuable land in this part of Docklands. With excellent public transport connections — it’s five minutes walk from the nearest DLR Station, four stops to Stratford and 15 minutes walk to Canary Wharf — it is not difficult to see why English Partnerships might be eyeing up the site for private sector redevelopment.

‘It’s got nothing to do with the design. The homes are
run down because the council won’t spend money on them’
Shirley Magnitsky, resident
But this is also Poplar, the true heart of London’s East End. While it may not have an organic butcher or gastropub, the area has a rich built environment that doubles as an accurate record of its history.
As well as the looming towers of Canary Wharf, the area is home to several landmark buildings, a reminder of better days when it was a thriving, close-knit community supported by local philanthropists such as shipbuilder Richard Green, whose statue stands in front of the art deco swimming pool on East India Dock Road, now closed and awaiting a new saviour.
Adjacent to Robin Hood Gardens and surrounded by generous landscaped grounds is Charles Hollis’s handsome All Saints Church, built in 1821 by merchant residents. Opposite All Saints DLR station and in front of a well proportioned public square, is the David Adjaye Idea Store with the bustling Chrisp Street Market beyond.
Nevertheless, on the kind of grey February day that London does so well, Robin Hood Gardens looks tired and downbeat, mainly because of its monotonous concrete dressing. But contrary to its image, it’s not covered in graffiti, there doesn’t appear to be any hoodies around and there are no burned out cars.
Despite the shabbiness, quality shines through. Generous windows dominate the main elevations and the dual-aspect maisonettes enjoy stunning views over the Lower Lea Valley in one direction and Canary Wharf in the other.
But it’s not just dreamy architects who understand the underlying quality of the Smithsons’ scheme. Fifth floor resident Magnitsky is passionate about the estate’s design. “When this was first built it was very modern and people were fighting to get in here. It was very cleverly built,” she says.
“The way it has upside down maisonettes, you never hear noise from anyone else. And the nice thing is that every room has plenty of light — one wall is all windows and you’re not looking into someone else’s house. I don’t think these people who are proposing thousands of new homes for this site have a clue.”
Aktar Hussain of the Robin Hood Garden’s Residents Association says the problem is that the people on the estate feel they have been abandoned. “People want to live in the same community but they want a better building.
“Some residents don’t treat it with care, but it’s not the design, it’s how they feel the council is treating them. The feeling is no one cares. Thirty per cent want to move out. It really needs an injection of capital, but most people don’t have a clue what the council is suggesting.”

‘It needs an injection of capital, but most people don’t have a clue what the council is suggesting’
Aktar Hussain, resident
Hussain says the park needs to be redesigned because despite all the space, it’s underused. “That space is badly planned and room could be made for other facilities: some shops, a café, social enterprise spaces with computers, places to do homework.”
Taking a walk around the estate we meet Mahad, 12, and his friends nine-year-old Hamza and 11-year-old Joshua, all of whom have no doubt that this is not just their home — it’s special. They are unimpressed by the plans for demolition.
“The council just say, ‘we want that demolished’, but they are not thinking,” says Mahad. “They’re taking down the culture of London. It has maintenance problems but it shouldn’t be knocked down.”
Hamza is next to stand up for his home patch. “I made a speech at school about the environment. Robin Hood Gardens was my example. The trees here soak up the carbon dioxide from the motorway.” Then Joshua pipes up: “There’s really good provisions here. Two stations, supermarkets, our school is nearby. They shouldn’t knock it down.”
But the last word goes to Magnitsky. “These spacious landings were designed by the architects to be a specific width so kids could play on it safely. All the neighbours come out, all the children intermix. They all run along and play. You don’t realise the impact small things like this have on your everyday life.”
ROBIN HOOD GARDENS TIMELINE
Credit:
Photo: Smithson Family Collection
-
Untitled Page 1952
Concept of “street-in-the-sky”, developed by architects Alison and Peter Smithson for the competition for Golden Lane London.
1961
Council tenants move into the Smithson-inspired Park Hill estate in Sheffield. London County Council employs private firms to design public housing in response to huge waiting list.
1962
Smithsons added to LCC housing framework.
1966
Smithsons commissioned for Robin Hood Gardens project.
1972
First tenants move in.
1977
Charles Jencks equates concrete with social deprivation and slams Robin Hood Gardens in his book the Language of Post Modern Architecture.
1984
Thames Television viewers vote it one of the worst modern buildings in London.
1993
Alison Smithson dies.
1995
Tower Hamlets invites architects to design concierge facilities without consulting Peter Smithson. He calls for the estate to be spot listed. London Dockland Development Cor-poration rejects the concierge proposals and asks the council to consult Smithson.
1998
Sheffield’s Park Hill estate is listed grade II*.
2003
Peter Smithson dies.
2005
Urban Splash and architects Hawkins Brown and Studio Egret West unveil plans to refurbish Park Hill estate.
2006
A building survey reveals “significant defects to the external envelope” of RHG.
2007
Horden Cherry Lee report for the Blackwall Reach Regeneration Project says homes could be refurbished for £70,000 each, but demolition is also an option.
March 2008
English Heritage to make listing recommendation to MP Margaret Hodge.
April 2008
Outline planning permission to be submitted on redevelopment funded by English Partnerships.
Postscript
:
Photos by Morley von Sternberg
Readers' comments
Robin Hood Gardens are to be saved. The story sounds very familiar to the actual attempt of tearing down the extraordinary living estate from Oswalt Mathias Ungers, built 1984 alomost in the center of Berlin, near the Tiergarten. It provides 76 terraces, each 30 sqm, very well organised, oppening to a lush inner garden. Because of speculation and the political will for a higher density and other tenants than middle class the only option seems to be demolition. But this not the choice for a sustaniable devlopement of our inner cities communities. No, we have to keep spacially well and generously designed buildings from the post war era. This is our culture. We have to keep these fine examples, and by a closer look also very actual examples of community living!!!
making "New" buildings doesn't always mean "Improvment". what needs to be improved is (as Shirley pointed out) the quality of facilities...
I am puzzled by this enthusiasm for RHG for three reasons. 1. It is not aesthetically on a par with the Unite d'habitation. Corbusier's building is beautiful. RHG is not. 2. I understood that the concept of streets in the air or "deck access" had been discredited decades ago because it encouraged crime. 3. How can a building be considered sustainable when it contains very little therml insulation in its external envelope. Please can someone explain what was so good about it.
Robin Hooh Gardens must to be saved¡
I live in some flats next to Robin Hood Gardens, which I bought several years ago. I have previously worked in the design industry and understand the ideaology of trying to save it. I would however suggest that the reports here are very one sided. Every day we have to walk past Robin Hood Gardens to get to/from the DLR. My girlfriend has long felt unsafe walking past it at night, for it is truely intimidating, and a recent incident of a passer by being badly beaten up and left comatose on the roadside has not increased her confidence. There is something about architecture which lifts or depresses a place. Robin Hood Gardens is truely depressing to live next to. I should no. Over 80% of residents in the block, at our recent meeting, thought it should be torn down. Why do people who don't have to live there feel qualified to suggest it isn't? Try it - there are several places to rent there, go and see if you would really want to live there. I'd be surprised. The plans Tower Hamlets have got in place look like a breath of fresh air to this long ignored area. Decking over the Blackwall Tunnel will decrease the noise pollution we get, and redeveloping the site of Robin Hood Gardens will create much better local facilities, homes and open space. Surely that is what we should be aiming to create, not saving something because it looks like a concrete monstrosity that we might want to come and stare at in 50 years time.
lm shirley magnitsky daughter and i lived in robinhood myself growing up in that area i loved it and lm sorry to hear that it condemed and its a shame for the community and i will miss it as its apart of my history and i grow up playing there as a child and living there lm 35 now and my kids play there now and there so if it goes the building will be missed