Report comment

Maybe it's just me. But I don't see anything wrong with the idea that if a public organisation is looking to spend money on a project (which was probably hard fought for), that they might want to see evidence that an architect has experience of said project type.

The main problem with the PQQ process, is that it has just been a way of funnelling designers into the PFI procument route. So the questions are geared towards things that are important to the contractors who will be paying the fees. Like value engineering, and how well you might fall into line under duress.