Report comment

Whilst no one is advocating a return to slum conditions, the implementation of mandatory space standards is a blunt instrument beloved of politicians; they are a totally unnecessary imposition. The RIBA's Case for Space report is totally unimaginative. I recently visited Dessau where first class modern 1930's architecture provided inexpensive individual storage areas in the basement of the block of flats rather than integrate it into flats. This works well and lowers costs. Domus (sorry BD) this month have an excellent issue on the creative use of (expensive) space. Compare this to the RIBA's consumer lead 'research' which tells us what we already know.

Neither does the RIBA's report consider changes in liftstyle. Smaller living spaces may be acceptable to younger people because in urban areas where less time is spent in the home. Following on from this point, we are also completing self contained student accommodation based on an average area of 18m2 which has a kitchen, shower room and study space included. OK, not a permanent living solution but it demonstrates there might be a solution to 'feeder' accommodation for people who's priority is to get housed rather than how big that home should be.

The RIBA did not delve too deeply into how space is actually used and architects should be more challenging about what a 'bedroom' actually should do. A shoe-box 3 bed semi might actually have more than enough space if that space was used more efficiently. Why should we all pay to store shoes last worn in 1970?