Report comment

I really don't know why the BDonline publish some of the worst projects of AA this year. These images doesn't do justice to the hard-working, talented students at all. It is actually an Insult. There are so many more interesting projects than these you have published. Where did you get the image sources from? Have you even been to the degree show and try to select what is good or bad or worth publishing?
An architectural publisher's job is to promote and positively encourage design talents right? I don't see why you always focus on the bad things about AA, which is really really rude for all the naive student there. I feel really sad about the media.

Here are some more better examples to publish than you have selected:

Inter 6 is focusing on technically solutions to construction, such as,
http://pr2012.aaschool.ac.uk/students/lara-yegenoglu

Inter 3 have a student doing a botanical/scientific experiment,
http://pr2012.aaschool.ac.uk/students/ling-leng

Inter 9 is focuising on laser cutting experimentation,
http://pr2012.aaschool.ac.uk/students/lucy-moroney

Dip 6 overall has a very interesting brief:
http://pr2012.aaschool.ac.uk/units/DIP-06

There are far more talented and interesting projects you can publish than these, unless you want to deliberately negatively dramatise AA every and each year, which you did.

On behalf of all hard-working and innocent students. It's not a easy journey for everyone to come here. I feel really sad.