Report comment

The two comments above miss the point. It isn't that massive projects should be given to smaller practices, its that the latter are excluded even from relatively small projects well within their range by ridiculous, counter productive and entirely unnecessary financial restrictions (e.g having to have £1m+ turnover to qualify for projects with fee values of less than £100k is not uncommon). This means the big firms who can easily tick the boxes, mop up this work too when its debatable to say the least, whether they deliver a better service in the context of smaller projects than a dynamic and hungry smaller practice.