Report comment

Err - I think perhaps the Councillor might have a point.

Surely the AHMM would share his desire to "make sure this is a building that’s capable of being more lovely than it is at the moment". I am sure AHMM could do this if the client paid for higher quality materials and the associated fees in making these changes.

It would not surprise me if at some point in the design process the architects would too "like the flat roofs to be accessible to the public so they could enjoy “fantastic views” across London". Probably something else cut from the scheme - only guessing here?

So let’s not criticise someone for wanting quality materials, up lifting contemporary design and access to roofs providing much needed public realm and open views across London.