facebook
Twitter
Linkedin
Feedback

Wednesday23 July 2014

Can I stop animal rights activists from harassing my staff?

  • Email
  • Comments (2)
  • Save

Some of my staff involved in a planning application have started to receive aggressive correspondence and phone calls from animal rights activists. Is there anything I can do?

The Protection from Harassment Act 1997 (PHA) allows you to apply to court to seek damages and an injunction to prevent harassment. As well as exploring civil remedies, it is often worth involving the police, since the conduct may amount to criminal offences, although prosecution will not of itself give you any personal rights.

It is possible that a well-worded letter, and the threat of going to court, may be sufficient. Alternatively, police involvement may stop the harassment. If these fail, the PHA may be your best remedy to prevent any recurrence.

Under the act, it is an offence for a person to “pursue a course of conduct which amounts to harassment of another, and which he or she knows or ought to know amounts to harassment of the other”. Whether a course of conduct amounts to harassment will be determined on a civil rather than criminal standard of proof, ie on “the balance of probabilities” not “beyond reasonable doubt”.

A course of conduct means conduct on at least two occasions, against one or more persons, and it is necessary for the conduct to be more than a series of isolated incidents. However, the conduct does not need to take the same form each time. Although conduct can include speech, and need not require either violence or threats of violence, it commonly does involve physical acts or putting words into action.

“Harassment” is not defined, although the PHA does provide that it includes “alarming the person or causing the person distress”, and the act also provides for a defence that the pursuit of the course of conduct was “reasonable in all the circumstances”. The absence of a statutory definition of harassment or defences means that the judge will consider the facts of each case on its own merits.

The court will only grant an injunction where it is persuaded that it is “just and convenient” to do so, even if the course of conduct does amount to harassment.

Injunctions constitute a restriction on individuals’ liberty, and breach will expose the person to the risk of a fine or imprisonment. Accordingly, the court generally seeks to impose the least restraint possible to satisfy the applicant. You will therefore need to consider carefully what precisely it is you want to restrain the person from doing.

It is fair to say that there is also a risk involved in the process. If an application for an injunction is made without notice to the person, then you will need to present a fair and balanced case, and draw all relevant matters to the court’s attention. You may be liable to damages if the person later persuades the court that the injunction should not have been given.

Independently from an injunction, you can also claim for damages. These may be awarded for any loss you have suffered through the harassment, which as well as any financial loss can include anxiety to you or your staff.

Share

Readers' comments (2)

  • You must inform the police. Explain you/your staff are receiving threats from Animal Rights Activists. Since about 2004, the law enforcement agencies have got their act together re Animal Rights Extremism. NETCU co-ordinates activities and they need to hear about all such behaviour. If any of your staff have received the "...drop this work, or else..." sort of message, then they are being blackmailed. Don't allow such behaviour to continue.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Strange... A few weeks ago my car which has vegan and Animal Rights stickers on it was vandalized. And before that I was stopped at a red light and a bunch of guys in a truck yelled "Hey, veg head - (explitive)" - and threw a bottle at me. Animal Rights activism has existed for over 30 years - there has yet to be a single death or injury to anyone. However, I can say without a doubt that 10 billion land mammels alone in the US are slaughtered for a "food" which is not only unnecessary but unhealthy as well --- The future is veganism. Time to evolve. www.humanemyth.org

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

sign in register
  • Email
  • Comments (2)
  • Save
Latest
News
Sign in

Email Newsletters

Sign out to login as another user

I'm searching for in
Desktop Site | Mobile Site